Neither Alexander or his evil stepfather appear during the whipping sequence in “Fanny and Alexander.” The whipping was implied with a sound effect and a series of close-ups of the witnesses. There was nothing titillating for a spankophile (though Justine’s pained expression was ambiguous and difficult for me to read). There was no homoeroticism. There was nothing to distract one from the bitter irony of a man who, in the guise of punishment for lying, bullied and tortured a boy into a false confession.
Alexander made a brave, if short-lived, stand against confessing something he didn’t believe. One stroke of the cane later he caved like a little girl. Frankly, I was embarrassed for Alexander. The boy Jose in “For Greater Glory” was tortured to death rather than deny his support for the Cristeros, who rebelled against Mexico during Plutarco Elías Calles’ persecution of the Catholic Church. To be fair, Jose may have been based on a real boy strengthened by the Spirit of God.
Alexander, though Bergman’s alter-ego in the movie, was a fictional character whose reactions were dictated by the writer/director’s rhetorical or dramatic needs. The pyrrhic victory of Alexander’s evil stepfather stands as a brilliant illustration of Jesus’ warning to hypocrites, You cross land and sea to make one convert, and when you get one, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves!1 The real Ingmar Bergman, as far as I know, rejected his real father’s Lutheran faith with as much vigor as Jose refused to forswear himself.
It got me thinking about growing up in the cult of boyhood. The cult derides a boy who can’t take it, whether pain or derision. It lauds a boy who runs at full speed, throws his body down, and slides through dirt and gravel, to be called “safe.” Bruises and blood are marks of honor. Tears are forbidden. The only acceptable response to pain is swearing or responding in kind, returning blow for blow. Boys are little soldiers in training. Anyone attempting to use physical pain to force a boy to forswear himself should be prepared for the violence that may require.
I have no idea if Erik Bergman treated his son Ingmar as ruthlessly as the evil stepfather treated Alexander. I only know that any attempt to produce faith and repentance in another through bullying and torture is a folly of the religious mind. Faith and repentance come from the Holy Spirit.
Or do you have contempt for the wealth of his kindness, forbearance, and patience, and yet do not know (ἀγνοῶν, a form of ἀγνοέω) that God’s kindness leads you to repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια)?2 And Paul counseled Timothy, the Lord’s slave must not engage in heated disputes but be kind toward all, an apt teacher, patient, correcting opponents with gentleness (πραΰτητι, a form of πραΰτης). Perhaps God will grant them repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια) and then knowledge (ἐπίγνωσιν, a form of ἐπίγνωσις) of the truth…3
As the ghost of Alexander’s “good” father said, “You must be gentle with people, Alexander.” And gentleness is an aspect of the fruit of the Spirit: the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness (πραΰτης), and self-control. Against such things there is no law [Table].4
Pingback: My Reasons and My Reason, Part 6 | The Gospel and the Religious Mind
Pingback: You Must Be Gentle, Part 1 | The Gospel and the Religious Mind