Tag Archives: John 15:6

Nothing True, Part 3

Posted on by

Eliphaz, the king of the Thaimanites1 responded to Job’s lament:

Masoretic Text

Septuagint

Job 4:1, 2 (Tanakh/KJV)

Job 4:1, 2 (NET)

Job 4:1, 2 (NETS)

Job 4:1, 2 (English Elpenor)
Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said, Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered: Now Eliphaz the Thaimanite continued and said, Then Eliphaz the Thaemanite answered and said,
If we assay (הֲנִסָּ֬ה) to commune with thee, wilt thou be grieved? but who can withhold himself from speaking? “If someone should attempt (nāsâ, הנסה) a word with you, will you be impatient? But who can refrain from speaking? “Have you often (μὴ πολλάκις) been addressed when in distress? But who can endure the force of your words? Hast thou been often (μὴ πολλάκις) spoken to in distress? but who shall endure the force of thy words?

“If one ventures a word with you, will you become impatient?”2 I thought Eliphaz was kind and very mindful of Job’s distress when I only read this English translation of the Masoretic text. Now I know that Eliphaz was a king who heard Job lament: I should have slept and been at rest, with kings [and] councillors of the earth, who gloried in [their] swords.3 So now I hear sarcasm in the words of Eliphaz.

The Hebrew word translated we assay (Tanakh, KJV) and someone should attempt (NET) was הֲנִסָּ֬ה (nāsâ). The first occurrence of a form of נָסָה (nāsâ) follows:

Masoretic Text

Septuagint

Genesis 22:1, 2 (Tanakh)

Genesis 22:1, 2 (NET)

Genesis 22:1, 2 (NETS)

Genesis 22:1, 2 (English Elpenor)
And it came to pass after these things, that G-d did prove (נִסָּ֖ה) Abraham, and said unto him: ‘Abraham’; and he said: ‘Here am I.’ Some time after these things God tested (nāsâ, נסה) Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here I am!” Abraham replied. And it came about after these matters that God tested (ἐπείραζεν) Abraham and said to him, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” AND it came to pass after these things that God tempted (ἐπείρασε) Abraam, and said to him, Abraam, Abraam; and he said, Lo! I [am here].
And He said: ‘Take now thy son, thine only son, whom thou lovest, even Isaac, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt-offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.’ God said, “Take your son—your only son, whom you love, Isaac—and go to the land of Moriah! Offer him up there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains which I will indicate to you.” And he said, “Take your beloved son Isaak, whom you love, and go into the high land, and offer him as a whole burnt offering on one of the mountains, whichever I mention to you.” And he said, Take thy son, the beloved one, whom thou hast loved– Isaac, and go into the high land, and offer him there for a whole-burnt-offering on one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

For what does the scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.”4 We are told explicitly (Hebrews 11:17-19 NET):

By faith Abraham, when he was tested (πειραζόμενος, a form of πειράζω), offered up Isaac. He had received the promises, yet he was ready to offer up his only son. God had told him, “Through Isaac descendants will carry on your name,” and he reasoned that God could even raise him from the dead, and in a sense he received him back from there.

It’s not too difficult to say that God did prove (Tanakh), did tempt (KJV), tested (NET, NETS) or tempted (English Elpenor) Job. That is precisely what the translators of the Tanakh on chabad.org decided that Eliphaz said to him (Job 4:2 Chabad Tanakh): 

“Because He tested you with [one] thing, should you weary? Who can withhold words?

But I wonder now if Eliphaz thought to continue that proving, tempting or testing by his own words. Or did he try (Tanakh), tempt (KJV, English Elpenor) or test (NET) God?

Masoretic Text

Septuagint

Exodus 17:2 (Tanakh)

Exodus 17:2 (NET)

Exodus 17:2 (NETS)

Exodus 17:2 (English Elpenor)
Wherefore the people strove with Moses, and said: ‘Give us water that we may drink.’ And Moses said unto them: ‘Why strive ye with me? wherefore do ye try (תְּנַסּ֖וּן) HaShem?’ So the people contended with Moses, and they said, “Give us water to drink!” Moses said to them, “Why do you contend with me? Why do you test (nāsâ, תנסון) the Lord?” And the people were railing against Moyses, saying, “Give us water so that we may drink!” And Moyses said to them, “Why are you railing at me, and why are you testing (πειράζετε) the Lord?” And the people reviled Moses, saying, Give us water, that we may drink; and Moses said to them, Why do ye revile me, and why tempt ye (πειράζετε) the Lord?

Both of these examples of forms of נָסָה (nāsâ) were translated with forms of πειράζω in the Septuagint. In fact, most occurrences of forms of נָסָה (nāsâ) in the Masoretic text were translated with forms of πειράζω in the Septuagint (see table below). One (Deuteronomy 28:56) was translated with a form of πεῖρα, the noun form of the verb πειράζω. Four (twice in Deuteronomy 6:16, once each in Deuteronomy 8:2 and 8:16) were translated with forms of ἐκπειράζω, leaving only two outliers and an allied word to consider.

Masoretic Text

Septuagint

1 Samuel 17:38, 39 (Tanakh)

1 Samuel 17:38, 39 (NET)

1 Reigns 17:38, 39 (NETS)

1 Kings 17:38, 39 (English Elpenor)
And Saul clad David with his apparel, and he put a helmet of brass upon his head, and he clad him with a coat of mail. Then Saul clothed David with his own fighting attire and put a bronze helmet on his head. He also put body armor on him. And Saoul put a woolen cloak on Dauid, and a bronze helmet around his head, And Saul clothed David with a military coat, and [put] his brazen helmet on his head.
And David girded his sword upon his apparel, and he essayed to go, but could not; for he had not tried it (נִסָּה֒). And David said unto Saul: ‘I cannot go with these; for I have not tried them (נִסִּ֑יתִי).’ And David put them off him. David strapped on his sword over his fighting attire and tried to walk around, but he was not used to them (nāsâ, נסה). David said to Saul, “I can’t walk in these things, for I’m not used to them (nāsâ, נסיתי).” So David removed them. and he girded Dauid with his sword over his woolen cloak, and he grew tired (ἐκοπίασεν) walking once and twice. And Dauid said to Saoul, “I shall definitely not be able to go in these, for I am not experienced (πεπείραμαι).” And they removed them from him. And he girt David with his sword over his coat: and he made trial (ἐκοπίασε) walking [with them] once and again: and David said to Saul, I shall not be able to go with these, for I have not proved [them] (πεπείραμαι): so they remove them from him.

The Greek word ἐκοπίασε(ν), a form of κοπιάω (NETS: he grew tired), cuts right to the heart of the matter and highlights the humor of this boy laboring to move in a man’s battle gear. And πεπείραμαι a form of πειράω in the middle voice (e.g., “to be used to”) makes it clear that David did not disparage the king’s offer or the battle attire offered. I think the rabbis who translated the Septuagint were confronting forms of נָסָה (nāsâ) here, and grappled with nuances that the English translator of the Elpenor Septuagint ignored even in Greek.

This brings me full circle to μὴ πολλάκις, the apparent translation of הֲנִסָּ֬ה (nāsâ) in Job 4:2. Though the literal meaning is not often the English translators of both versions of the Septuagint treated this phrase as a rhetorical question: Have you often (NETS) or Hast thou been often (English Elpenor). This is a legitimate way to treat μὴ at the beginning of a clause:5

Introducing a rhetorical question which expects a negative answer:
μὴ φύλαξ τοῦ ἀδελφοῦ μού εἰμι ἐγώ;
am I my brother’s keeper? (Gen 4:9)

Though I might otherwise have questioned whether הֲנִסָּ֬ה (nāsâ) was the original word the rabbis found to translate, this exercise has made me more willing to assume that they recognized nuance in the Hebrew that I might miss in a more direct Greek translation. The rabbis didn’t hear Eliphaz requesting permission to speak if it would not cause Job too much distress. They heard an assertion, if not an accusation, that Job was unaccustomed to such distress.

Masoretic Text

Septuagint

Job 4:3-5 (Tanakh/KJV)

Job 4:3-5 (NET)

Job 4:3-5 (NETS)

Job 4:3-5 (English Elpenor)
Behold, thou hast instructed many, and thou hast strengthened the weak hands. Look, you have instructed many; you have strengthened feeble hands. So what, if you instructed many and encouraged the hands of the weak one, For whereas thou hast instructed many, and hast strengthened the hands of the weak one,
Thy words have upholden him that was falling, and thou hast strengthened the feeble knees. Your words have supported those who stumbled, and you have strengthened the knees that gave way. lifted up the weak with your words and wrapped feeble knees in courage— and hast supported the failing with words, and hast imparted courage to feeble knees.
But now it is come upon thee, and thou faintest; it toucheth thee, and thou art troubled (וַתִּבָּהֵֽל). But now the same thing comes to you, and you are discouraged; it strikes you, and you are terrified (bāhal, ותבהל). but now distress has come upon you and touched you, and you acted in haste (ἐσπούδασας). Yet now [that] pain has come upon thee, and touched thee, thou art troubled (ἐσπούδασας).

I looked back at the words when I first read the book of Job (Job 4:3-5 NASB):

Behold, you have taught many, And you have strengthened weak hands. Your words have helped the stumbling to stand, And you have strengthened feeble knees. But now it comes to you, and you are impatient; It touches you, and you are horrified.

I thought Eliphaz was reasoning calmly with Job, encouraging (if not praising him, but certainly encouraging) him to return again to the man he once was. This is embarrassing. Even beyond embarrassing, it is disconcerting because it is around this same time that I thought Jesus was a conceited know-it-all, rude, overly critical, laying word traps into which people would fall so He could berate them.

I was neither self-aware enough nor honest enough to acknowledge those beliefs at the time. I only became aware of them as I knew Him better and they were replaced by a better understanding of the Bible. (I certainly knew how I was supposed to feel about Jesus, and was as practiced as anyone, I suppose, in the fake it till you make it school of Christian teaching.) This time studying through the book of Job it seems fairly clear that Eliphaz accused Job of being an empty talker, a hypocrite, if you will, in the modern sense of the word.

The Hebrew word וַתִּבָּהֵֽל (bāhal), translated and thou art troubled (Tanakh/KJV), and you are terrified (NET), was ἐσπούδασας (a form of σπουδάζω), translated thou art troubled (English Elpenor) and you acted in haste (NETS). Being more familiar with forms of σπουδάζω in the New Testament, I thought this was an odd, even a questionable, choice. So I reviewed some of the verses containing forms of σπουδάζω:

[James, Cephas, and John] requested only that we remember the poor, the very thing I also was eager (ἐσπούδασα, another form of σπουδάζω) to do.6 I, therefore, the prisoner for the Lord, urge you to live worthily of the calling with which you have been called…making every effort (σπουδάζοντες, another form of σπουδάζω) to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.7 Make every effort (σπούδασον, another form of σπουδάζω) to present yourself before God as a proven worker who does not need to be ashamed, teaching the message of truth accurately.8

Thus we must make every effort (Σπουδάσωμεν, another form of σπουδάζω) to enter that rest, so that no one may fall by following the same pattern of disobedience.9 Therefore, brothers and sisters, make every effort (σπουδάσατε, another form of σπουδάζω) to be sure of your calling and election. For by doing this you will never stumble into sin (ου μη10 πταισητε ποτε; literally, “never stumble once”).11 Therefore, dear friends, since you are waiting for these things, strive (σπουδάσατε, another form of σπουδάζω) to be found at peace, without spot or blemish, when you come into his presence.12

When I tried to obey these commands in my own strength, seeking to have my own righteousness derived from13 these very commands received as rules, I caused myself a level of anxiety similar to that which Eliphaz accused Job of having. I was making myself like that proverbial branch that is thrown out…and dries up14 by not remaining or abiding in Jesus. I was like one of those foolish Galatians…trying to finish by human effort. But the Lord rescued me from my folly. The only reason I don’t respond immediately to that level of anxiety in forms of σπουδάζω currently, is that He has begun to teach me to walk by the Spirit.

A table comparing the definitions of וַתִּבָּהֵֽל (bāhal) and σπουδάζω follows:

וַתִּבָּהֵֽל (bāhal)

σπουδάζω
to disturb, alarm, terrify, hurry, be disturbed, be anxious, be afraid, be hurried, be nervous to hasten, hurry, use speed, act with speed; to be zealous, eager, diligent; to be busy, be persistent; to become mentally unsettled

Taken at face value, these words are more alike than I was fully appreciating. I considered Paul’s usage of ἐσπουδάσαμεν: But when we were separated from you, brothers and sisters, for a short time (in presence, not in affection) we became all the more fervent (ἐσπουδάσαμεν, another form of σπουδάζω) in our great desire to see you in person.15 There was probably more anxiety in Paul’s more fervent…desire than I allowed before undertaking this exercise: So when I could bear it no longer, I sent to find out about your faith, for fear that the tempter (ὁ πειράζων) somehow16 tempted (ἐπείρασεν) you and our toil had proven useless.17

I’ll conclude this essay with the chabad.org translation of Job 4:3-5 (Chabad Tanakh):

Behold, you have chastised many, and you have strengthened weak hands. Your words would pick up the stumbler, and you would strengthen buckling knees. Now when it comes to you, you weary; it touches you and you are frightened.

According to a note (5) in the NET Paul quoted from Genesis 15:6. A table below compares the Greek of Romans 4:3b to that of the Septuagint.

Romans 4:3b (NET Parallel Greek)

Genesis 15:6 (Septuagint BLB) Table

Genesis 15:6 (Septuagint Elpenor)
ἐπίστευσεν δὲ Ἀβραὰμ τῷ θεῷ καὶ ἐλογίσθη αὐτῷ εἰς δικαιοσύνην καὶ ἐπίστευσεν Αβραμ τῷ θεῷ καὶ ἐλογίσθη αὐτῷ εἰς δικαιοσύνην καὶ ἐπίστευσεν ῞Αβραμ τῷ Θεῷ, καὶ ἐλογίσθη αὐτῷ εἰς δικαιοσύνην

Romans 4:3b (NET)

Genesis 15:6 (NETS)

Genesis 15:6 (English Elpenor)
Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness. And Abram believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness. And Abram believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness.

According to a note (22) in the NET Hebrews 11:18b was a quotation from Genesis 21:12b. A table below compares the Greek of Hebrews 11:18b to that of the Septuagint.

Hebrews 11:18b (NET Parallel Greek)

Genesis 21:12b (Septuagint BLB) Table

Genesis 21:12b (Septuagint Elpenor)
ὅτι ἐν Ἰσαὰκ κληθήσεται σοι σπέρμα ὅτι ἐν Ισαακ κληθήσεταί σοι σπέρμα ὅτι ἐν ᾿Ισαὰκ κληθήσεταί σοι σπέρμα

Hebrews 11:18b (NET)

Genesis 21:12b (NETS)

Genesis 21:12b (English Elpenor)
through Isaac descendants will carry on your name for in Isaak offspring shall be named for you for in Isaac shall thy seed be called

The table mentioned above follows:

Forms of נָסָה (nāsâ)
Reference Hebrew KJV / NET Greek NETS / English Elpenor
Genesis 22:1 נִסָּ֖ה did tempt / tested ἐπείραζεν / ἐπείρασε tested / tempted
Exodus 15:25 נִסָּֽהוּ he proved them / he tested them ἐπείρασεν / ἐπείρασε he tested / he proved
Exodus 16:4 אֲנַסֶּ֛נּוּ I may prove them / I may test them πειράσω I might test / I may try
Exodus 17:2 תְּנַסּ֖וּן do ye tempt / do you test πειράζετε are you testing / tempt ye
Exodus 17:7 נַסֹּתָ֤ם they tempted / of their testing τὸ πειράζειν they tested / they tempted
Exodus 20:20 נַסּ֣וֹת prove / test τοῦ πειράσαι to test / to try
Numbers 14:22 וַיְנַסּ֣וּ and have tempted / and yet have tempted καὶ ἐπείρασάν and tested / and have tempted
Deuteronomy 4:34 הֲנִסָּ֣ה hath…assayed / has…tried ἐπείρασεν ever attempted / has assayed
Deuteronomy 6:16 תְנַסּ֔וּ Ye shall…tempt / You must…put…to the test ἐκπειράσεις You shall…tempt / Thou shalt…tempt
נִסִּיתֶ֖ם ye tempted / you did ἐξεπειράσασθε / ἐξεπειράσατε you tempted / ye tempted him
Deuteronomy 8:2 לְנַסֹּֽתְךָ֗ to prove thee / he might…test you ἐκπειράσῃ σε / πειράσῃ σε test you / try thee
Deuteronomy 8:16 נַסֹּתֶ֔ךָ he might prove thee / he might…test you ἐκπειράσῃ σε test you / thoroughly try thee
Deuteronomy 13:3 מְנַסֶּ֞ה proveth / will be testing πειράζει is testing / tries
Deuteronomy 28:56 נִסְּתָ֤ה would…adventure / would…think πεῖραν an attempt / has…assayed
Deuteronomy 33:8 נִסִּיתוֹ֙ thou didst prove / authority you challenged ἐπείρασαν they tempted
Judges 2:22 נַסּ֥וֹת I may prove / test τοῦ πειράσαι to test / to prove
Judges 3:1 לְנַסּ֥וֹת to prove / to test πειράσαι to test / to prove
Judges 3:4 לְנַסּ֥וֹת to prove / to test πειράσαι to test / to prove
Judges 6:39 אֲנַסֶּ֚ה let me prove / allow…test πειράσω I will make trial / I will…make…trial
1 Samuel 17:39 נִסָּה֒ he had…proved / he was…used to ἐκοπίασεν / ἐκοπίασε he grew tired / he made trial
נִסִּ֑יתִי I have…proved / I’m…used to πεπείραμαι I am…experienced / I have…proved [them]
1 Kings 10:1 לְנַסֹּת֖וֹ to prove him / to challenge him πειράσαι αὐτὸν to test him / to try him
2 Chronicles 9:1 לְנַסּוֹת֩ to prove / to challenge τοῦ πειράσαι to test / to prove
2 Chronicles 32:31 לְנַ֨סּוֹת֔וֹ to try him / to test him τοῦ πειράσαι αὐτὸν to test him / to try him
Job 4:2 הֲנִסָּ֬ה we assay / someone should attempt μὴ πολλάκις Have you often / Hast thou been often
Psalm 26:2 וְנַסֵּ֑נִי and prove me / and test me καὶ πείρασόν με and try me
Psalm 78:18 וַיְנַסּוּ And they tempted / They willfully challenged καὶ ἐξεπείρασαν And they tested / And they tempted
Psalm 78:41 וַיְנַסּ֣וּ and tempted / challenged καὶ ἐπείρασαν and tested / and tempted
Psalm 78:56 וַיְנַסּ֣וּ Yet they tempted / Yet they challenged καὶ ἐπείρασαν And they tested / Yet they tempted
Psalm 95:9 נִ֖סּוּנִי tempted me / challenged my authority ἐπείρασαν tried / tempted me
Psalm 106:14 וַיְנַסּוּ and tempted / they challenged καὶ ἐπείρασαν and put…to the test / and tempted
Ecclesiastes 2:1 אֲנַסְּכָ֥ה I will prove thee / I will try πειράσω σε let me test you / I will prove thee
Ecclesiastes 7:23 נִסִּ֣יתִי have I proved / I have examined ἐπείρασα I tested / have I proved
Isaiah 7:12 אֲנַסֶּ֖ה will I tempt / put…to a test πειράσω will I put…to the test / will I tempt
Daniel 1:12 נַס Prove / test πείρασον Do test / Prove
Daniel 1:14 וַיְנַסֵּ֖ם and proved them / and tested them καὶ ἐπείρασεν αὐτοὺς and tested them / and proved them

Tables comparing Job 4:1; 4:2; Genesis 22:1; 22:2; Exodus 17:2; 1 Samuel 17:38; 17:39; Job 4:3; 4:4 and 4:5 in the Tanakh, KJV and NET, and tables comparing the Greek of Job 4:1; 4:2; Genesis 22:1; 22:2; Exodus 17:2; 1 Samuel (Reigns, Kings) 17:38; 17:39; Job 4:3; 4:4 and 4:5 in the Septuagint (BLB and Elpenor), and a table comparing the Greek of 1 Thessalonians 3:5 in the NET and KJV follow.

Job 4:1 (Tanakh)

Job 4:1 (KJV)

Job 4:1 (NET)
Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said, Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said, Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered:

Job 4:1 (Septuagint BLB)

Job 4:1 (Septuagint Elpenor)
ὑπολαβὼν δὲ Ελιφας ὁ Θαιμανίτης λέγει ΥΠΟΛΑΒΩΝ δὲ ᾿Ελιφὰζ ὁ Θαιμανίτης λέγει

Job 4:1 (NETS)

Job 4:1 (English Elpenor)
Now Eliphaz the Thaimanite continued and said, Then Eliphaz the Thaemanite answered and said,

Job 4:2 (Tanakh)

Job 4:2 (KJV)

Job 4:2 (NET)
If we assay to commune with thee, wilt thou be grieved? but who can withhold himself from speaking? If we assay to commune with thee, wilt thou be grieved? but who can withhold himself from speaking? “If someone should attempt a word with you, will you be impatient? But who can refrain from speaking?

Job 4:2 (Septuagint BLB)

Job 4:2 (Septuagint Elpenor)
μὴ πολλάκις σοι λελάληται ἐν κόπῳ ἰσχὺν δὲ ῥημάτων σου τίς ὑποίσει μὴ πολλάκις σοι λελάληται ἐν κόπῳ; ἰσχὺν δὲ ῥημάτων σου τίς ὑποίσει

Job 4:2 (NETS)

Job 4:2 (English Elpenor)
“Have you often been addressed when in distress? But who can endure the force of your words? Hast thou been often spoken to in distress? but who shall endure the force of thy words?

Genesis 22:1 (Tanakh)

Genesis 22:1 (KJV)

Genesis 22:1 (NET)
And it came to pass after these things, that G-d did prove Abraham, and said unto him: ‘Abraham’; and he said: ‘Here am I.’ And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am. Some time after these things God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here I am!” Abraham replied.

Genesis 22:1 (Septuagint BLB)

Genesis 22:1 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ ἐγένετο μετὰ τὰ ῥήματα ταῦτα ὁ θεὸς ἐπείραζεν τὸν Αβρααμ καὶ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτόν Αβρααμ Αβρααμ ὁ δὲ εἶπεν ἰδοὺ ἐγώ ΚΑΙ ἐγένετο μετὰ τὰ ρήματα ταῦτα ὁ Θεός ἐπείρασε τὸν ῾Αβραὰμ καὶ εἶπεν αὐτῷ· ῾Αβραάμ, ῾Αβραάμ. ὁ δὲ εἶπεν· ἰδοὺ ἐγώ

Genesis 22:1 (NETS)

Genesis 22:1 (English Elpenor)
And it came about after these matters that God tested Abraham and said to him, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” AND it came to pass after these things that God tempted Abraam, and said to him, Abraam, Abraam; and he said, Lo! I [am here].

Genesis 22:2 (Tanakh)

Genesis 22:2 (KJV)

Genesis 22:2 (NET)
And He said: ‘Take now thy son, thine only son, whom thou lovest, even Isaac, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt-offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.’ And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of. God said, “Take your son—your only son, whom you love, Isaac—and go to the land of Moriah! Offer him up there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains which I will indicate to you.”

Genesis 22:2 (Septuagint BLB)

Genesis 22:2 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ εἶπεν λαβὲ τὸν υἱόν σου τὸν ἀγαπητόν ὃν ἠγάπησας τὸν Ισαακ καὶ πορεύθητι εἰς τὴν γῆν τὴν ὑψηλὴν καὶ ἀνένεγκον αὐτὸν ἐκεῖ εἰς ὁλοκάρπωσιν ἐφ᾽ ἓν τῶν ὀρέων ὧν ἄν σοι εἴπω καὶ εἶπε· λαβὲ τὸν υἱόν σου τὸν ἀγαπητόν, ὃν ἠγάπησας, τὸν ᾿Ισαάκ, καὶ πορεύθητι εἰς τὴν γῆν τὴν ὑψηλὴν καὶ ἀνένεγκον αὐτὸν ἐκεῖ εἰς ὁλοκάρπωσιν ἐφ᾿ ἓν τῶν ὀρέων, ὧν ἄν σοι εἴπω

Genesis 22:2 (NETS)

Genesis 22:2 (English Elpenor)
And he said, “Take your beloved son Isaak, whom you love, and go into the high land, and offer him as a whole burnt offering on one of the mountains, whichever I mention to you.” And he said, Take thy son, the beloved one, whom thou hast loved– Isaac, and go into the high land, and offer him there for a whole-burnt-offering on one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

Exodus 17:2 (Tanakh)

Exodus 17:2 (KJV)

Exodus 17:2 (NET)
Wherefore the people strove with Moses, and said: ‘Give us water that we may drink.’ And Moses said unto them: ‘Why strive ye with me? wherefore do ye try HaShem?’ Wherefore the people did chide with Moses, and said, Give us water that we may drink. And Moses said unto them, Why chide ye with me? wherefore do ye tempt the LORD? So the people contended with Moses, and they said, “Give us water to drink!” Moses said to them, “Why do you contend with me? Why do you test the Lord?”

Exodus 17:2 (Septuagint BLB)

Exodus 17:2 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ ἐλοιδορεῖτο ὁ λαὸς πρὸς Μωυσῆν λέγοντες δὸς ἡμῖν ὕδωρ ἵνα πίωμεν καὶ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς Μωυσῆς τί λοιδορεῖσθέ μοι καὶ τί πειράζετε κύριον καὶ ἐλοιδορεῖτο ὁ λαὸς πρὸς Μωυσῆν λέγοντες· δὸς ἡμῖν ὕδωρ, ἵνα πίωμεν. καὶ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς Μωυσῆς· τί λοιδορεῖσθέ μοι, καὶ τί πειράζετε Κύριον

Exodus 17:2 (NETS)

Exodus 17:2 (English Elpenor)
And the people were railing against Moyses, saying, “Give us water so that we may drink!” And Moyses said to them, “Why are you railing at me, and why are you testing the Lord?” And the people reviled Moses, saying, Give us water, that we may drink; and Moses said to them, Why do ye revile me, and why tempt ye the Lord?

1 Samuel 17:38 (Tanakh)

1 Samuel 17:38 (KJV)

1 Samuel 17:38 (NET)
And Saul clad David with his apparel, and he put a helmet of brass upon his head, and he clad him with a coat of mail. And Saul armed David with his armour, and he put an helmet of brass upon his head; also he armed him with a coat of mail. Then Saul clothed David with his own fighting attire and put a bronze helmet on his head. He also put body armor on him.

1 Samuel 17:38 (Septuagint BLB)

1 Kings 17:38 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ ἐνέδυσεν Σαουλ τὸν Δαυιδ μανδύαν καὶ περικεφαλαίαν χαλκῆν περὶ τὴν κεφαλὴν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐνέδυσε Σαοὺλ τὸν Δαυὶδ μανδύαν καὶ περικεφαλαίαν χαλκῆν περὶ τὴν κεφαλήν αὐτοῦ

1 Reigns 17:38 (NETS)

1 Kings 17:38 (English Elpenor)
And Saoul put a woolen cloak on Dauid, and a bronze helmet around his head, And Saul clothed David with a military coat, and [put] his brazen helmet on his head.

1 Samuel 17:39 (Tanakh)

1 Samuel 17:39 (KJV)

1 Samuel 17:39 (NET)
And David girded his sword upon his apparel, and he essayed to go, but could not; for he had not tried it. And David said unto Saul: ‘I cannot go with these; for I have not tried them.’ And David put them off him. And David girded his sword upon his armour, and he assayed to go; for he had not proved it. And David said unto Saul, I cannot go with these; for I have not proved them. And David put them off him. David strapped on his sword over his fighting attire and tried to walk around, but he was not used to them. David said to Saul, “I can’t walk in these things, for I’m not used to them.” So David removed them.

1 Samuel 17:39 (Septuagint BLB)

1 Kings 17:39 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ ἔζωσεν τὸν Δαυιδ τὴν ῥομφαίαν αὐτοῦ ἐπάνω τοῦ μανδύου αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐκοπίασεν περιπατήσας ἅπαξ καὶ δίς καὶ εἶπεν Δαυιδ πρὸς Σαουλ οὐ μὴ δύνωμαι πορευθῆναι ἐν τούτοις ὅτι οὐ πεπείραμαι καὶ ἀφαιροῦσιν αὐτὰ ἀπ᾽ αὐτοῦ καὶ ἔζωσε τὸν Δαυὶδ τὴν ρομφαίαν αὐτοῦ ἐπάνω τοῦ μανδύου αὐτοῦ. καὶ ἐκοπίασε περιπατήσας ἅπαξ καὶ δίς· καὶ εἶπε Δαυὶδ πρὸς Σαούλ· οὐ μὴ δύνωμαι πορευθῆναι ἐν τούτοις, ὅτι οὐ πεπείραμαι. καὶ ἀφαιροῦσιν αὐτὰ ἀπ᾿ αὐτοῦ

1 Reigns 17:39 (NETS)

1 Kings 17:39 (English Elpenor)
and he girded Dauid with his sword over his woolen cloak, and he grew tired walking once and twice. And Dauid said to Saoul, “I shall definitely not be able to go in these, for I am not experienced.” And they removed them from him. And he girt David with his sword over his coat: and he made trial walking [with them] once and again: and David said to Saul, I shall not be able to go with these, for I have not proved [them]: so they remove them from him.

Job 4:3 (Tanakh)

Job 4:3 (KJV)

Job 4:3 (NET)
Behold, thou hast instructed many, and thou hast strengthened the weak hands. Behold, thou hast instructed many, and thou hast strengthened the weak hands. Look, you have instructed many; you have strengthened feeble hands.

Job 4:3 (Septuagint BLB)

Job 4:3 (Septuagint Elpenor)
εἰ γὰρ σὺ ἐνουθέτησας πολλοὺς καὶ χεῖρας ἀσθενοῦς παρεκάλεσας εἰ γὰρ σὺ ἐνουθέτησας πολλοὺς καὶ χεῖρας ἀσθενοῦς παρεκάλεσας

Job 4:3 (NETS)

Job 4:3 (English Elpenor)
So what, if you instructed many and encouraged the hands of the weak one, For whereas thou hast instructed many, and hast strengthened the hands of the weak one,

Job 4:4 (Tanakh)

Job 4:4 (KJV)

Job 4:4 (NET)
Thy words have upholden him that was falling, and thou hast strengthened the feeble knees. Thy words have upholden him that was falling, and thou hast strengthened the feeble knees. Your words have supported those who stumbled, and you have strengthened the knees that gave way.

Job 4:4 (Septuagint BLB)

Job 4:4 (Septuagint Elpenor)
ἀσθενοῦντάς τε ἐξανέστησας ῥήμασιν γόνασίν τε ἀδυνατοῦσιν θάρσος περιέθηκας ἀσθενοῦντάς τε ἐξανέστησας ρήμασι, γόνασί τε ἀδυνατοῦσι θάρσος περιέθηκας

Job 4:4 (NETS)

Job 4:4 (English Elpenor)
lifted up the weak with your words and wrapped feeble knees in courage— and hast supported the failing with words, and hast imparted courage to feeble knees.

Job 4:5 (Tanakh)

Job 4:5 (KJV)

Job 4:5 (NET)
But now it is come upon thee, and thou faintest; it toucheth thee, and thou art troubled. But now it is come upon thee, and thou faintest; it toucheth thee, and thou art troubled. But now the same thing comes to you, and you are discouraged; it strikes you, and you are terrified.

Job 4:5 (Septuagint BLB)

Job 4:5 (Septuagint Elpenor)
νῦν δὲ ἥκει ἐπὶ σὲ πόνος καὶ ἥψατό σου σὺ δὲ ἐσπούδασας νῦν δὲ ἥκει ἐπὶ σὲ πόνος καὶ ἥψατό σου, σὺ ἐσπούδασας

Job 4:5 (NETS)

Job 4:5 (English Elpenor)
but now distress has come upon you and touched you, and you acted in haste. Yet now [that] pain has come upon thee, and touched thee, thou art troubled.

1 Thessalonians 3:5 (NET)

1 Thessalonians 3:5 (KJV)
So when I could bear it no longer, I sent to find out about your faith, for fear that the tempter somehow tempted you and our toil had proven useless. For this cause, when I could no longer forbear, I sent to know your faith, lest by some means the tempter have tempted you, and our labour be in vain.

1 Thessalonians 3:5 (NET Parallel Greek)

1 Thessalonians 3:5 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)

1 Thessalonians 3:5 (Byzantine Majority Text)
διὰ τοῦτο καγὼ μηκέτι στέγων ἔπεμψα εἰς τὸ γνῶναι τὴν πίστιν ὑμῶν, μή πως ἐπείρασεν ὑμᾶς ὁ πειράζων καὶ εἰς κενὸν γένηται ὁ κόπος ἡμῶν δια τουτο καγω μηκετι στεγων επεμψα εις το γνωναι την πιστιν υμων μηπως επειρασεν υμας ο πειραζων και εις κενον γενηται ο κοπος ημων δια τουτο καγω μηκετι στεγων επεμψα εις το γνωναι την πιστιν υμων μηπως επειρασεν υμας ο πειραζων και εις κενον γενηται ο κοπος ημων

1 Job 2:11 (NETS) Table

2 Job 4:2a (NASB)

3 Job 3:13b, 14 (English Elpenor)

4 Romans 4:3 (NET)

5 From the definition of μὴ in the Koine Greek Lexicon online.

6 Galatians 2:10 (NET)

7 Ephesians 4:1, 3 (NET)

8 2 Timothy 2:15 (NET)

9 Hebrews 4:11 (NET)

11 2 Peter 1:10 (NET)

12 2 Peter 3:14 (NET)

14 John 15:6b (NET) Table

15 1 Thessalonians 2:17 (NET)

16 The NET parallel Greek text and NA28 had μή (NET: for fear that) πως (NET: somehow) here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had μηπως (KJV: lest by some means).

17 1 Thessalonians 3:5 (NET)

He Takes Away, Part 2

Posted on by

A gnat of a notion that takes away may not be the best translation of αἴρει (a form of αἴρω) in, He takes away every branch that does not bear fruit in me,[1] became important enough to address directly.  Here is a table of possible translations.

Meanings of αἴρω Possible Translations of αἴρει in John 15:2a
to lift up, take up, pick up He lifts up every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to look up (in prayer) He looks up (in prayer) every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to move upward, raise vertically He moves every branch that does not bear fruit in me upward.
to raise to a higher level He raises every branch that does not bear fruit in me to a higher level.
to take up and carry along He takes up and carries along every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to lift up and carry away, remove He lifts up and carries away every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to take away, remove (no suggestion of lifting up) He takes away every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to bear with, endure He bears with every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to carry, transport He carries every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to bear and uphold He bears and upholds every branch that does not bear fruit in me.
to be dressed as an office-bearer He dresses every branch that does not bear fruit in me as an office-bearer.
to cause to emerge He causes every branch that does not bear fruit in me to emerge.

The previous essay went in a direction I didn’t expect.  Though I enjoyed diagramming sentences in elementary school, I had no idea I could begin to do it in Greek.  Comparing the Greek construction of the clauses of John 15:2a to Mark 4:15b and Luke 8:12b I realized that Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away[2] was structurally more like with their hands they will lift you up[3] than either immediately Satan comes and snatches the word that was sown in them,[4] or then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved.[5]

Here I want to consider Paul’s usage of a similar metaphor.  I realize this can be frustrating.  I’m well past the point where at other times in my life I’ve abandoned Jesus and done whatever I wanted instead.  But ever since I prayed my slightly insulting prayer of miniscule faith—“If you’re really out there, I really want to know you”—something has changed.  “Whatever I wanted instead” has never turned out to be exactly what I wanted then or now.  For the flesh has desires that are opposed to the Spirit, and the Spirit has desires that are opposed to the flesh, for these are in opposition to each other, so that you cannot do what you want.[6]  I eventually wound up back with Jesus studying the Bible.

With this history between us, we laugh at my frustration now, go to bed, get up and do it again the next morning.  Now[7] I am speaking to you Gentiles, Paul wrote believers in Rome (Romans 11:13-21 NET).

Seeing that[8] I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry, if somehow I could provoke my people to jealousy and save some of them.  For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead? [Table]  If the first portion of the dough offered is holy, then the whole batch is holy, and if the root is holy, so too are the branches.

Now if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among them and participated in the richness of the olive root,[9] do not boast over the branches.  But if you boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you.  Then you will say, “The branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in” [Table].  Granted!  They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand by faith.  Do not be arrogant, but fear!  For if God did not spare the natural branches, perhaps he will not spare you.

The Greek words translated perhaps above in the NET parallel Greek text and NA28 were μή πως, and μήπως in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text.  The former were in brackets indicating a suspicion that μή πως may not be original.  For all I know that is a suspicion that μήπως is more original.  I’m not studying the manuscripts.  From a logical perspective, however, I could argue that perhaps is not original to Paul.

For if God did not spare the natural branches (those in Israel who did not believe Jesus), he will not spare you (Gentiles who do not believe Jesus).  Gentiles (ἔθνεσιν and ἐθνῶν, both forms of ἔθνος) do not comprise a special favored class with potentially unique rights and privileges in Paul’s theology.  And will…spare you (σοῦ φείσεται) here means to spare one from being broken off in the future as some were broken off (ἐξεκλάσθησαν, a form of ἐκκλάω) in the past from participation in the richness of the olive root (NET) or partaking in the root and fatness of the olive tree (KJV).

Viewed from the perspective Paul revealed in this passage the question was not: is this the time when you are restoring the kingdom to Israel?[10]  Rather, the question was: “is this the time you are restoring Israel to the kingdom?”  But Jesus didn’t correct his disciples’ question (Acts 1:7, 8 NET).

He told them, “You are not permitted to know the times or periods that the Father has set by his own authority.  But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest parts of the earth” [Table].

So how does this relate to He takes away every branch that does not bear fruit in me?  I made the connection initially through the English word branches.  I got in trouble for that kind of thinking once.

I had written an essay much like one of these, comparing/contrasting various passages from the Bible, but had made my linkages in English translation only.  I showed it to my brother.  He was not very far into it before he got red in the face and tore it up.  This wasn’t something stored on disc somewhere that I could easily reprint.  It was my only copy laboriously typed.  But I don’t want to make it sound worse than it was.  I was a musician, an athlete and a sinner.  I was used to being yelled at, didn’t necessarily like it, but very accustomed to it.

What hurt the most was that I had been sincerely excited about what I thought I was learning in my new NASB Bible.  When my brother calmed down, he showed me how to use Strong’s Concordance.  It was a big book only keyed to the KJV at the time.  So I began the habit of reading the NASB, checking with the KJV, looking up words in the concordance and writing out lists of verses which contained the Greek or Hebrew word in question.  When I looked back at my lists of verses and couldn’t recall the sense they had made to me, I copied longer passages.  Eventually I got a Commodore 64 and started typing verses and passages.  Different computers and more notes later, I looked back at my lists of Bible passages.  When I couldn’t remember what I was thinking at the time I had compiled them, I began to write essays again.

Here are some of the differences between the two passages in question.

Romans 11:16, 17 (NET)

John 15:1, 2 (NET)
11:16 root ρίζα 15:1 vine ἄμπελος
branches κλάδοι, a form of κλάδος 15:2 branch κλῆμα
11:17 κλάδων, another form of κλάδος
broken off ἐξεκλάσθησαν, a form of ἐκκλάω takes away αἴρει, a form of αἴρω

A Greek reader wouldn’t necessarily make any connection between these metaphors based on these words.  The only potential connection is the imagery conjured by the words.  I took the following for comparison: If anyone does not remain[11] in me, he is thrown out like a branch, and dries up; and such branches are gathered up and thrown into the[12] fire, and are burned up.[13]  Jesus is trying to get me to slow down and pay particular attention to the Greek.  So here goes.

Romans 11:21

 John 15:6
 NET Parallel Greek Stephanus Textus Receptus  NET Parallel Greek

Stephanus Textus Receptus
εἰ γὰρ ὁ θεὸς τῶν κατὰ φύσιν κλάδων οὐκ ἐφείσατο, [μή πως] οὐδὲ σοῦ φείσεται ει γαρ ο θεος των κατα φυσιν κλαδων ουκ εφεισατο μηπως ουδε σου φεισηται ἐὰν μή τις μένῃ ἐν ἐμοί, ἐβλήθη ἔξω ὡς τὸ κλῆμα καὶ ἐξηράνθη καὶ συνάγουσιν αὐτὰ καὶ εἰς τὸ πῦρ βάλλουσιν καὶ καίεται εαν μη τις μεινη εν εμοι εβληθη εξω ως το κλημα και εξηρανθη και συναγουσιν αυτα και εις πυρ βαλλουσιν και καιεται

NET

 KJV NET

KJV
For if God did not spare the natural branches, perhaps he will not spare you. For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed[14] lest he also spare not thee. If anyone does not remain in me, he is thrown out like a branch, and dries up; and such branches are gathered up and thrown into the fire, and are burned up. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.

There is a factual statement in Romans 11:21 indicated by the negation οὐκ and the verb it negates: God did not spare the natural branches.  Or if I put the words back closer to their order in Greek: God the natural branches did not spare.  The phrase did…spare was the way the NET translators rendered ἐφείσατο, a form of φείδομαι in the aorist tense and the indicative mood.

Then he used that fact (εἰ γὰρ, translated For if) to deduce another: he will not spare you.  Or if I put the words back closer to their order in Greek: neither you will he spare.  The phrase will…spare was the way the NET translators rendered φείσεται, another form of φείδομαι in the future tense and the indicative mood.  The negation οὐδὲ is a negation of fact as well.

So, if Paul actually felt the necessity to place μή πως or μηπως in the midst of this deductively valid if-then statement, it says something extraordinary, not about Gentiles but about being in Christ.  And though the originality of μή πως is questioned in the NA28 and NET parallel Greek text, it still stands.

Jesus proposed a hypothetical situation.  This is indicated by the qualified negation μή and the verb μένῃ.[15]  Justin Alfred in a posting on the BLB Blog, “EMPHATIC NEGATIONS IN BIBLICAL GREEK,” quoted from Thayer’s Greek Lexicon:

µή, the Septuagint for אַל , אַיִן , אֵין, a particle of negation, which differs from οὐ (which is always an adverb) in that οὐ denies the thing itself (or to speak technically, denies simply, absolutely, categorically, directly, objectively), but µή denies the thought of the thing, or the thing according to the judgment, opinion, will, purpose, preference, of someone (hence, as we say technically, indirectly, hypothetically, subjectively).

The Greek verb translated does…remain (NET) is μένῃ, a form of μένω in the present tense and subjunctive mood.  “It is an important distinction to understand…that the only place in which ‘time’ comes to bear directly upon the tense of a verb is when the verb is in the indicative mood.  In all other moods and uses the aktionsart of the verb tense should be seen as primary.”[16]

What is the aktionsart?

In English, we think of the tense of a verb as denoting the “time” of the action. In Greek also time is indicated by tense, but only absolutely so in the Indicative mood. And time is not the primary significance of Greek tenses. Fundamentally, Kind of Action, rather than Time of Action, is indicated by tense…

The kind of action indicated by the use of the present tense is durative…

The durative (linear or progressive) in the present stem: the action is represented as durative (in progress) and either as timeless (ἔστιν ὁ θεός) or as taking place in present time (including, of course, duration on one side or the other of the present moment: γράφω ‘I am writing [now]’;…The present stem may also be iterative: ἔβαλλεν ‘threw repeatedly (or each time)’. (Blass & DeBrunner, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, p. 166.)[17]

So a word like μένῃ is durative (in progress).  I can grasp that.  Except for tense If anyone does not remain in me (present tense) was translated as if the Greek was identical to if God did not spare the natural branches (past tense).  It gives me the impression that one has remained in Jesus at some point in the past but presently does not.  The qualified negation μή does not immediately precede the verb μένῃ, however, as the absolute negation does (οὐκ ἐφείσατο) in Paul’s factual statement.  In Jesus’ hypothetical statement μή immediately precedes the pronoun and creates something more like a logical category, μή τις μένῃ (if not one remaining in me).  Granted, remaining may not be the best translation of the present tense, but I’m trying to avoid adding the helper verb to do.

The translators assumed that the verb ἐβλήθη (a form of βάλλω) had no subject, so they supplied he: ἐβλήθη ἔξω, he is thrown out.  The aorist tense is so weird I’m sure a clever translator can justify the present tense here.  But the main reason ἐβλήθη ἔξω was translated he is thrown out rather than “he was thrown out” is the assumption that it has no subject.  The supplied subject he seems to refer back to the first clause, so the aorist verb must be conformed to the present tense because the verb μένῃ is in the present tense.

A table of the verbs in John 15:6, excluding μένῃ, follows.

Verb A Form Of… Syntactical Classification NET KJV
ἐβλήθη βάλλω Aorist Tense, Passive Voice, Indicative Mood, 3rd Person Singular is thrown is cast
ἐξηράνθη ξηραίνω Aorist Tense, Passive Voice, Indicative Mood, 3rd Person Singular dries up is withered
συνάγουσιν συνέχω Present Tense, Active Voice, Indicative Mood, 3rd Person Plural are gathered up gather
βάλλουσιν βάλλω Present Tense, Active Voice, Indicative Mood, 3rd Person Plural thrown cast
καίεται καίω Present Tense, Middle/Passive Voice, Indicative Mood, 3rd Person Singular are burned up are burned

I think I can do more justice to these verbs by assuming that τὸ κλῆμα was the intended subject of at least the singular verbs: “If not one remaining in me, like a branch was thrown out and dried up.”  (The NIV translators did this for the first two singular verbs.)

The next two plural verbs are tricky.  The KJV translators supplied men as the subject.  A note (21) in the NET acknowledged that “they gather them up and throw them into the fire” is an appropriate translation of the Greek.  But I think the NET translators were onto something (despite translating the two active verbs in a passive voice) treating αὐτὰ as an implied subject/object of this sudden intrusion of plural branches, such branches: “If not one remaining in me, like a branch was thrown out and dried up, such branches are gathered up and thrown into the fire.”

The final verb is singular again and refers back to the singular branch, τὸ κλῆμα: “If not one remaining in me, like a branch was thrown out and dried up, such branches are gathered up and thrown into the fire, and it burns.”  Or if I want to be a stickler about the active voice: “If not one remaining in me, like a branch was thrown out and dried up, they gather them up and throw them into the fire, and it burns.”  I need to add some words to make this anything like an English sentence: “If [he is] not one remaining in me, [he is] like a branch [that] was thrown out and dried up, they gather them up and throw them into the fire, and it burns.”

About this time it dawned on me that maybe that was the translators’ intent all along and my own tendency to read a sin/punishment motif into things prevented me from understanding it that way.  Another note (20) in the NET makes this supposition doubtful as far as the NET translators are concerned.  But then, that‘s what I’ve grown to appreciate about the NET, the sense that the translators and I are from the same socially constructed reality, the same religious milieu, unlike the KJV translators.

So, just about the time I began to feel like I was straining out a gnat, I was reminded of the camel I was compelled to swallow if I didn’t entertain this particular one.

The Greek words translated thrown out are ἐβλήθη (a form of βάλλω) ἔξω.  It is not, “If anyone does not remain in me, he throws himself out;” ἐβλήθη is in the passive voice.  The implication is that the one who does not remain in me (ἐν ἐμοί) is thrown out by someone else.  The gardener, Jesus’ father, is the most likely referent in this metaphor.  This gardener (our Father to all who believe) would do two things then: 1) He takes away every branch in Jesus that bears no fruit; and, 2) He throws out every branch that does not remain in Jesus.

Everyone whom the Father gives me will come to me, Jesus said, and the one who comes to me I will never send away[18]…(but the gardener, my Father, might).

I’ll pick this up in another essay.  Tables comparing Luke 8:12; Romans 11:13; 11:17 and John 15:6 in the NET and KJV follow.

Luke 8:12 (NET)

Luke 8:12 (KJV)
Those along the path are the ones who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved. Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.

NET Parallel Greek

 Stephanus Textus Receptus

Byzantine Majority Text
οἱ δὲ παρὰ τὴν ὁδόν εἰσιν οἱ ἀκούσαντες, εἶτα ἔρχεται ὁ διάβολος καὶ αἴρει τὸν λόγον ἀπὸ τῆς καρδίας αὐτῶν, ἵνα μὴ πιστεύσαντες σωθῶσιν οι δε παρα την οδον εισιν οι ακουοντες ειτα ερχεται ο διαβολος και αιρει τον λογον απο της καρδιας αυτων ινα μη πιστευσαντες σωθωσιν οι δε παρα την οδον εισιν οι ακουοντες ειτα ερχεται ο διαβολος και αιρει τον λογον απο της καρδιας αυτων ινα μη πιστευσαντες σωθωσιν

Romans 11:13 (NET)

Romans 11:13 (KJV)
Now I am speaking to you Gentiles.  Seeing that I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry, For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:

NET Parallel Greek

 Stephanus Textus Receptus

Byzantine Majority Text
ὑμῖν δὲ λέγω τοῖς ἔθνεσιν· ἐφ᾿ ὅσον μὲν οὖν εἰμι ἐγὼ ἐθνῶν ἀπόστολος, τὴν διακονίαν μου δοξάζω υμιν γαρ λεγω τοις εθνεσιν εφ οσον μεν ειμι εγω εθνων αποστολος την διακονιαν μου δοξαζω υμιν γαρ λεγω τοις εθνεσιν εφ οσον μεν ειμι εγω εθνων αποστολος την διακονιαν μου δοξαζω

Romans 11:17 (NET)

Romans 11:17 (KJV)
Now if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among them and participated in the richness of the olive root, And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;

NET Parallel Greek

 Stephanus Textus Receptus

Byzantine Majority Text
Εἰ δέ τινες τῶν κλάδων ἐξεκλάσθησαν, σὺ δὲ ἀγριέλαιος ὢν ἐνεκεντρίσθης ἐν αὐτοῖς καὶ συγκοινωνὸς τῆς ρίζης τῆς πιότητος τῆς ἐλαίας ἐγένου ει δε τινες των κλαδων εξεκλασθησαν συ δε αγριελαιος ων ενεκεντρισθης εν αυτοις και συγκοινωνος της ριζης και της πιοτητος της ελαιας εγενου ει δε τινες των κλαδων εξεκλασθησαν συ δε αγριελαιος ων ενεκεντρισθης εν αυτοις και συγκοινωνος της ριζης και της πιοτητος της ελαιας εγενου

John 15:6 (NET)

John 15:6 (KJV)
If anyone does not remain in me, he is thrown out like a branch, and dries up; and such branches are gathered up and thrown into the fire, and are burned up. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.

 

NET Parallel Greek

 Stephanus Textus Receptus

Byzantine Majority Text
ἐὰν μή τις μένῃ ἐν ἐμοί, ἐβλήθη ἔξω ὡς τὸ κλῆμα καὶ ἐξηράνθη καὶ συνάγουσιν αὐτὰ καὶ εἰς τὸ πῦρ βάλλουσιν καὶ καίεται εαν μη τις μεινη εν εμοι εβληθη εξω ως το κλημα και εξηρανθη και συναγουσιν αυτα και εις πυρ βαλλουσιν και καιεται εαν μη τις μεινη εν εμοι εβληθη εξω ως το κλημα και εξηρανθη και συναγουσιν αυτα και εις το πυρ βαλλουσιν και καιεται

[1] John 15:2a (NET)

[2] John 15:2a (KJV)

[3] Matthew 4:6b (NET)

[4] Mark 4:15b (NET) Table

[5] Luke 8:12b (NET)

[6] Galatians 5:17 (NET) Table

[7] The NET parallel Greek text and NA28 had δὲ here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had γαρ (KJV: For).

[8] The NET parallel Greek text and NA28 had οὖν (not translated in the NET) here.  The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text did not.

[9] The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had της ριζης και της πιοτητος της ελαιας εγενου (KJV: of the root and fatness of the olive tree) here, where the NET parallel Greek text and NA28 had τῆς ρίζης τῆς πιότητος τῆς ἐλαίας ἐγένου (NET: in the richness of the olive root).

[10] Acts 1:6b (NET) Table

[11] The NET parallel Greek text and NA28 had μένῃ here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had μεινη (KJV: abide).

[12] The NET parallel Greek text, NA28 and Byzantine Majority Text had the article τὸ here.  The Stephanus Textus Receptus did not.

[13] John 15:6 (NET)

[14] The Stephanus Textus Receptus is the closest Greek text that I have found online to serve as parallel Greek for the KJV.  Here is one of the places it falls short.  According to Strong’s Concordance circa 1890 a form of ὁράω (ὁρᾶτε possibly) occurred somewhere in this verse, translated take heed.

[15] The verb was μεινη (another form of μένω) in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text.  I don’t think that would alter what I’m saying here about a “hypothetical situation” but I am struggling with both the qualified negation and aorist tense.

[16] Greek Verbs (Shorter Definitions), Verb Tenses, Time & “Kind of Action” in Greek Verbs

[17] Aktionsart & the Present Tense

[18] John 6:37 (NET) Table

My Deeds, Part 3

Posted on by

There is a table representing my unstudied view of the relationship of the clauses of Revelation 2:26-29.  I’m considering the clause, who continues in my deeds until the end, because it tugs the hardest at me to return to my own works.  I’ve begun to try to understand τὰ ἔργα μου, translated my deeds, with a study of τηρῶν (a form of τηρέω), translated who continues.  The most basic understanding of τηρῶν is: Blessed is the one who stays alert and does not lose (τηρῶν, a form of τηρέω) his clothes so that he will not have to walk around naked…[1]  It means to keep, not to lose or discard.

To review, the NET translation of John 14:21 confirms both my initial belief and practice, that obeying Jesus’ commands was the path to loving Him, knowing Him and being loved by Him and his Father.  Refining the translation obeys to keeps lowers the standard a bit but doesn’t alter the order of events, that Jesus and his Father loved me because I first loved Jesus (by keeping his commandments, not losing or discarding them).  But this argument was preceded by another, outlined below:

If you love Me…

John 14:15a (NASB)

 …you will keep (τηρήσετε, another form of τηρέω) My commandments.

John 14:15b (NASB)
I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides (μένει, a form of μένω; present tense) with you and will be (ἔσται, a form of εἰμί; future tense) in you.

John 14:16, 17 (NASB)
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control…

Galatians 5:22, 23a (NASB)
I have not come to abolish [the law or the prophets] but to fulfill them.

Matthew 5:17b (NET)

 …love is the fulfillment of the law.

Romans 13:10b (NET)
He who has My commandments and keeps (τηρῶν, a form of τηρέω) them…

John 14:21a (NASB)

 …is the one who loves Me…

John 14:21b (NASB)

I will love Jesus and keep his commandments by the Holy Spirit who abides with me and will be in me.  If I concede to the old man (Ephesians 4:22-24; Colossians 3:9-11), fighting for its own survival by attempting to lose or discard Jesus’ commandments, though it may not alter God’s love for me, I have ceased to love Him with the love that is the fruit of his Spirit, the love that is the fulfillment of the law, no matter what I tell myself and no matter how much emotion I feel for Him.

In this essay I’ll consider John’s explanation, And the person who keeps (τηρῶν, a form of τηρέω) his commandments resides in God, and God in him,[2] but I’ll back up first to take a run at it (1 John 2:28, 29 NET):

And now, little children, remain (μένετε, a form of μένω) in him, so that when he appears we may have confidence and not shrink away from him in shame when he comes back.  If you know that he is righteous, you also know that everyone who practices (ποιῶν, a form of ποιέω) righteousness has been fathered by him.

The Greek word translated fathered was γεγέννηται (a form of γεννάω).  John didn’t leave us wondering what he meant by it: Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been fathered (γεγέννηται, a form of γεννάω) by God…[3]  He had a unique understanding of the word μένετε as one of the twelve Jesus sent out with the following instruction (I’ve included Luke 10:7 though it was addressed to the seventy-two others Jesus appointed and sent on ahead of Him).

Mark 6:10 (NET)

Luke 9:4 (NET)

Luke 10:7 (NET)
[Jesus] said to them, “Wherever you enter a house, stay (μένετε, a form of μένω) there until you leave the area.” Whatever house you enter, stay (μένετε, a form of μένω) there until you leave the area. Stay (μένετε, a form of μένω) in that same house, eating and drinking what they give you, for the worker deserves his pay.  Do not move around from house to house.

I understand what it means to stay in a house, to not move around from place to place.  But what does it mean to stay in God?  A few verses prior to this John wrote (1 John 2:24 NET):

As for you, what you have heard from the beginning must remain (μενέτω, another form of μένω) in you.  If what you heard from the beginning remains (μείνῃ, another form of μένω) in you, you also will remain (μενεῖτε, another form of μένω) in the Son and in the Father.

So I remain in the Son and in the Father if Jesus’ teaching remains in me.  Here is Jesus’ teaching on the subject (John 15:4, 5a NET):

Remain (μείνατε, another form of μένω) in me, and I will remain in you.  Just as the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it remains (μένῃ, another form of μένω) in the vine, so neither can you unless you remain (μένητε, another form of μένω) in me.  I am the vine; you are the branches.  The one who remains (μένων, another form of μένω) in me – and I in him – bears much fruit…

In other words, remaining in Jesus (and his Father) by remaining in the teaching I have heard from the beginning of my new life in Christ (assuming that teaching was the Gospel of Christ) brings forth the fruit: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control that is the fulfillment of the law.  Jesus continued, because apart from me you can accomplish nothing.[4]  I don’t think He meant that I couldn’t become a hypocrite, an actor playing at righteousness more or less skillfully.  Jesus warned, unless your righteousness goes beyond that of the experts in the law and the Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.[5]  But I can’t do the righteousness that fulfills the law apart from remaining in Jesus by remaining in his teaching.

Jesus continued teaching his disciples (John 15:6 NET):

If anyone does not remain (μένῃ, another form of μένω) in me, he is thrown out like a branch, and dries up; and such branches are gathered up and thrown into the fire, and are burned up.

He listed some impediments either to hearing in the beginning or to what was heard from the beginning remaining (Luke 8:11-15 NET):

Now the parable means this: The seed is the word of God (ὁ λόγος τοῦ θεοῦ).  Those along the path are the ones who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved.  Those on the rock are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root.  They believe for a while, but in a time of testing fall away (ἀφίστανται, a form of ἀφίστημι).  As for the seed that fell among thorns, these are the ones who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked (συμπνίγονται, a form of συμπνίγω) by the worries and riches and pleasures of life, and their fruit does not mature.  But as for the seed that landed on good soil, these are the ones who, after hearing the word, cling (κατέχουσιν, a form of κατέχω) to it with an honest and good heart, and bear fruit with steadfast endurance.

If you remain (μείνητε, another form of μένω) in me and my words remain (μείνῃ, another form of μένω) in you, Jesus continued, ask whatever you want, and it will be done (γενήσεται, a form of γίνομαι) for you.  My Father is honored by this, that you bear much fruit and show that you are (γένησθε, another form of γίνομαι) my disciples.[6]  The words if and whatever are the same Greek word ἐὰν.  I understand this request as related to, and bracketed by, bearing fruit.  I’m unsure about translating ἐὰν whatever.  In my case it led to unbelief while—ask [if] you want, and it will be done (or, become) for you—has led to some faith-confirming results.  Jesus continued (John 15:9, 10 NET):   

Just as the Father has loved me, I have also loved you; remain (μείνατε, another form of μένω) in my love.  If you obey (τηρήσητε, another form of τηρέω) my commandments, you will remain (μενεῖτε, another form of μένω) in my love, just as I have obeyed (τετήρηκα, another form of τηρέω) my Father’s commandments and remain (μένω) in his love.

This is how I understood this passage even when the Bible I read translated τηρήσητε keep and τετήρηκα kept.  “Jesus promises to love the disciples if they obey his commandments,” reads the sermon notes for John 15:9-17 on Sermon Writer online.  Here, and other places like it, I turned from being led by the Holy Spirit, especially if my behavior was too embarrassing too often to confess any longer, to take charge of my own righteousness in my own strength.

See what sort of love the Father has given to us: that we should be called God’s children,[7] John continued.  The note (1) in the NET reads:

The ἵνα (Jina) clause is best understood (1) as epexegetical (or explanatory), clarifying the love (ἀγάπην, agapen) that the Father has given to believers. Although it is possible (2) to regard the ἵνα as indicating result, the use of ποταπήν (potapen, “what sort of”) to modify ἀγάπην suggests that the idea of “love” will be qualified further in the following context, and this qualification is provided by the epexegetical ἵνα clause.

I think option (2) is the better understanding.  The sort of love the Father has given to us is not the Father’s feeling for us, but a very practical gift: It is the love that is patient, the love that is kind, the love that bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.[8]  This love may be shared in.  It is the fruit of his Spirit, the fulfillment of the law.  This love may be remained in or may be left behind.  If I leave God’s love behind to run ahead in my own strength God’s love has not and does not change.  If I do not remain in his love I strive way too hard to become a highly-skilled hypocrite rather than receiving the love he has given us.  He gave us this sort of love in order that we should be called God’s children.  Paul concurred with John (Romans 5:5b; 7:6b; 8:3, 4, 14 NET):

…the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us…

…so that we may serve in the new life of the Spirit and not under the old written code.

For God achieved what the law could not do because it was weakened through the flesh.  By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and concerning sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, so that the righteous requirement of the law may be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

For all who are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God.

“To remain in Jesus’ love,” the entry in SermonWriter reads, “suggests being immersed in Jesus’ love—surrounded by Jesus’ love—comforted by Jesus’ love—empowered by Jesus’ love.  Imagine a swimming pool filled, not with water, but with Jesus’ love.”  All analogies have their problems but this one isn’t too bad.  Ordinarily one tries not to drown in a swimming pool.  A pool of Jesus’ love is really only threatening to the old man (Ephesians 4:25-5:5; Colossians 3:12-17).  The believer lives and breathes in its environs, in fact, only in its environs.  This pool travels with the believer, but the believer can leave the pool.  A believer leaving the pool of God’s love does not change God’s love at all.  Leaving only changes the believer’s access to, and appreciation of, God’s love.  Jesus’ and John’s point was, don’t get out of God’s love.

Here is John again (1 John 3:1-10 NET):

(See what sort of love the Father has given to us: that we should be called God’s children – and indeed we are!  For this reason the world does not know us: because it did not know him.  Dear friends, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet been revealed.  We know that whenever it is revealed we will be like him, because we will see him just as he is.  And everyone who has this hope focused on him purifies himself, just as Jesus is pure).

Everyone who practices (ποιῶν, a form of ποιέω) sin also practices (ποιεῖ, another form of ποιέω) lawlessness; indeed, sin is lawlessness.  And you know that Jesus was revealed to take away (ἄρῃ, a form of αἴρω) sins, and in him there is no sin.  Everyone who resides (μένων, another form of μένω) in him does not sin; everyone who sins has neither seen him nor known him.  Little children, let no one deceive you: The one who practices (ποιῶν, a form of ποιέω) righteousness is righteous, just as Jesus is righteous.  The one who practices (ποιῶν, a form of ποιέω) sin is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning.  For this purpose the Son of God was revealed: to destroy the works of the devil.  Everyone who has been fathered (γεγεννημένος, another form of γεννάω) by God does not practice (ποιεῖ, another form of ποιέω) sin, because God’s seed resides (μένει, another form of μένω) in him, and thus he is not able to sin, because he has been fathered (γεγέννηται, a form of γεννάω) by God.  By this the children of God and the children of the devil are revealed: Everyone who does not practice (ποιῶν, a form of ποιέω) righteousness – the one who does not love his fellow Christian (ἀδελφὸν, a form of ἀδελφός) – is not of God.

Now if I do what I do (ποιῶ, another form of ποιέω) not want, Paul wrote believers in Rome, it is no longer me doing it but sin that lives in me.[9]  It is better to greet John’s and Paul’s explanations with faith than with fear or mockery.  But the Spirit of God relentlessly dragged me back when my default position was to “chuck this whole religion thing.”  He was kind and patient when my default position became do-it-myself sanctification, when I said in so many words, “I can’t trust You with something as important as MY righteousness.”  Jaco Gericke had a very different testimony.  I rationalize this difference with Paul’s conclusion: So then, God has mercy on whom he chooses to have mercy, and he hardens whom he chooses to harden.[10]  Others rationalize it as individual free will.

When I was young righteousness was a matter of good habits developed through willpower because Jesus had saved me.  Now I can see this as a childish misunderstanding of potentially good teaching.  But at the time I saw Jesus’ salvation only as a reason, why I should do righteousness, never as a cause, how I could do righteousness.  My willpower proved to be unequal to the task.  I am weak-willed vis-à-vis righteousness.  So I tend to minimize the effect of my will and magnify the effect of God’s mercy.   Now that I understand that Jesus’ salvation causes righteousness I have replaced willpower with the fruit of the Holy Spirit.  Of course, I still don’t recognize any habit in me toward the good apart from that daily infusion of his love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.

On the other hand, I proved to be quite willful, stubborn, rebellious and stiff-necked regarding my sin.  So I tend to see free will as more useful, or more conducive, to sinning.  I don’t tend to argue the point because I can see how one who had more success than I did could regard willpower as helpful in the pursuit of righteousness.  Still, I keep my mind open to the possibility that the preachers of free will may have taken more credit for that righteousness than they deserve.

Little children, John continued, let us not love with word or with tongue but in deed and truth.[11]  As Jesus tried to teach me about the righteousness of God through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ for all who believe,[12] I got tripped up here quite often.  I thought, especially if my performance was less than perfect when I had attempted to trust Him, that his teaching was not his teaching but me playing word games, loving with word (λόγῳ, a form of λόγος) or with tongue (γλώσσῃ, a form of γλῶσσα).  “No, you really have to do it,” I heard many times from my elders if I tried to share what I thought I had been learning.  How I ever thought that obeying rules in my own strength might become loving in deed (ἔργῳ, a form of ἔργον) and truth (ἀληθείᾳ, a form of ἀλήθεια), I can’t explain apart from being willful, stubborn, rebellious and stiff-necked.  Now I assume that loving with word or with tongue corresponds to my hypocrisy, while loving in deed and truth corresponds to being led by his Holy Spirit.

John continued (1 John 3:19-24 NET):

And by this we will know that we are of the truth (ἀληθείας, another form of ἀλήθεια) and will convince our conscience in his presence, that if (ἐὰν) our conscience condemns us, that God is greater than our conscience and knows all things.  Dear friends, if (ἐὰν) our conscience does not condemn us, we have confidence in the presence of God, and whatever (ἐὰν; or if) we ask we receive from him, because we keep his commandments and do the things that are pleasing to him.  Now this is his commandment: that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he gave us the commandment.  And the person who keeps his commandments resides (μένει, another form of μένω) in God, and God in him.  Now by this we know that God resides (μένει, another form of μένω) in us: by the Spirit he has given us.

I want to conclude this essay by addressing one of the statements in the entry in Sermon Writer directly:

The emphasis is love.  Love begins with the Father and flows through the Son to the disciples (v. 9).  It is contingent on obedience…Jesus promises to love the disciples if they obey his commandments.

The demonstrably false statement—“Jesus promises to love the disciples if they obey his commandments”—mischaracterizes God’s love and remaining in his love.  First, consider Jesus’ teaching on the nature of the Father’s love (Matthew 5:43-48 NET):

You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor’ and ‘hate your enemy.’  But I say to you, love your enemy and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be like your Father in heaven, since he causes the sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.  For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have?  Even the tax collectors do the same, don’t they?  And if you only greet your brothers, what more do you do?  Even the Gentiles do the same, don’t they?  So then, be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Jesus’ love for me is not equivalent to, or contingent upon, my remaining in his love.  Jesus loves me because God is love and Jesus remains in his Father’s love.  If and only if I remain in his love I will bear the fruit of his Spirit, the love which is the fulfillment of the law, and obey him thereby.  It is not that his love, or even remaining in his love, is contingent upon some open-ended obedience of mine but that my obedience is contingent upon his love and my remaining in his love.

Here the misdirection of translating forms of τηρέω with forms of obey becomes evident.  To keep Jesus’ commandments, not to lose or discard them, has much more in common with his words remaining in us than it does with any form of obey.  Even as I write this I hear the quibble in my head: “But you have obeyed: you have remained in his love by clinging to his teaching.”  I write this quibble off to the religious mind.

I acknowledged the religious mind as nothing more than the carnal mind or the outlook of the flesh, but the term still serves a useful purpose for me.  I expect the carnal mind or the outlook of the flesh to be focused directly on sin.  The pretense of the religious mind is its focus on righteousness, albeit a righteousness of its own derived from the law with a keen desire to justify itself by law.  Consider Jesus’ teaching on the subject (Luke 17:10 NET):

“So you too, when you have done everything you were commanded to do, should say, ‘We are slaves undeserving of special praise; we have only done what was our duty.’”

As I’ve written before, we have this attitude not because we are in some wretched social condition but because our deeds have been done in (or, by) God[13]…for the one bringing forth (ἐνεργῶν, a form of ἐνεργέω) in you both the desire (θέλειν, a form of θέλω) and the effort (ἐνεργεῖν, another form of ἐνεργέω) – for the sake of his good pleasure – is God.[14]

[1] Revelation 16:15b (NET)

[2] 1 John 3:24a (NET)

[3] 1 John 5:1a (NET)

[4] John 15:5b (NET)

[5] Matthew 5:20 (NET)

[6] John 15:7, 8 (NET) Table

[7] 1 John 3:1a (NET)

[8] 1 Corinthians 13:7 (NET)

[9] Romans 7:20 (NET)

[10] Romans 9:18 (NET)

[11] 1 John 3:18 (NET)

[12] Romans 3:22a (NET)

[13] John 3:21b (NET)

[14] Philippians 2:13 (NET)